Evaluation of the distribution and impacts of parasites, pathogens, and pesticides on honey bee (apis mellifera) populations in east Africa
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (Icipe), Nairobi, Kenya; Department of Biological Sciences, South Eastern Kenya University (SEKU), Kitui, Kenya; Center for Pollinator Research, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, United States
In East Africa, honey bees (Apis mellifera) provide critical pollination services and income for small-holder farmers and rural families. While honey bee populations in North America and Europe are in decline, little is known about the status of honey bee populations in Africa. We initiated a nationwide survey encompassing 24 locations across Kenya in 2010 to evaluate the numbers and sizes of honey bee colonies, assess the presence of parasites (Varroa mites and Nosema microsporidia) and viruses, identify and quantify pesticide contaminants in hives, and assay for levels of hygienic behavior. Varroa mites were present throughout Kenya, except in the remote north. Levels of Varroa were positively correlated with elevation, suggesting that environmental factors may play a role in honey bee host-parasite interactions. Levels of Varroa were negatively correlated with levels of hygienic behavior: however, while Varroa infestation dramatically reduces honey bee colony survival in the US and Europe, in Kenya Varroa presence alone does not appear to impact colony size. Nosema apis was found at three sites along the coast and one interior site. Only a small number of pesticides at low concentrations were found. Of the seven common US/European honey bee viruses, only three were identified but, like Varroa, were absent from northern Kenya. The number of viruses present was positively correlated with Varroa levels, but was not correlated with colony size or hygienic behavior. Our results suggest that Varroa, the three viruses, and Nosema have been relatively recently introduced into Kenya, but these factors do not yet appear to be impacting Kenyan bee populations. Thus chemical control for Varroa and Nosema are not necessary for Kenyan bees at this time. This study provides baseline data for future analyses of the possible mechanisms underlying resistance to and the long-term impacts of these factors on African bee populations.©2014 Muli et al.
pesticide; pesticide; Africa; animal behavior; article; environmental impact assessment; honeybee; host parasite interaction; hygiene; Kenya; nonhuman; Nosema; organism colony; parasite control; parasite identification; parasite localization; parasite migration; population abundance; survival rate; Varroa; varroosis; virus identification; animal; bee; drug effects; environmental exposure; environmental protection; host pathogen interaction; parasitology; physiology; pollination; population dynamics; toxicity; Varroidae; Africa, Eastern; Animals; Bees; Conservation of Natural Resources; Environmental Exposure; Host-Pathogen Interactions; Pesticides; Pollination; Population Dynamics; Varroidae
0965441, NSF, National Stroke Foundation